Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Functional, asset and risk analysis excludes diversified technology companies from captive software development comparables under cost-plus arrangemen...
Mobile-phone electronic evidence failed to establish customs undervaluation, while duty survived on non-authentic origin certificates without importer...
Automotive radio classification treats integrated infotainment features as supplementary, placing complete and qualifying unassembled units under the ...
Separate corporate personality prevents directors from being personally liable for company deposits without a guarantee or independent legal undertaki...
Advance Pricing Agreement methodology may guide transfer-pricing...
Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unchanged.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Advance Pricing Agreement methodology may guide transfer-pricing benchmarking for an assessment year outside the agreement's term if the FAR analysis and underlying activities do not materially differ from covered years. Where Revenue challenges reliance on that methodology, it must establish the relevant factual distinction. A Transfer Pricing Officer who rejects the taxpayer's benchmarking in favour of the Other Method should apply that method and determine an arm's length price, rather than fixing a nil price on an ad hoc basis.
Advance Pricing Agreement methodology may guide transfer-pricing benchmarking for an assessment year outside the agreement's term if the FAR analysis and underlying activities do not materially differ from covered years. Where Revenue challenges reliance on that methodology, it must establish the relevant factual distinction. A Transfer Pricing Officer who rejects the taxpayer's benchmarking in favour of the Other Method should apply that method and determine an arm's length price, rather than fixing a nil price on an ad hoc basis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.