Head Office cost allocation requires prescribed transfer-pricing methods; treaty ceilings bar surcharge and cess, while duplicate taxation is excluded...
Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Functional, asset and risk analysis requires comparables for a...
Functional, asset and risk analysis excludes diversified technology companies from captive software development comparables under cost-plus arrangements.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Functional, asset and risk analysis requires comparables for a captive software development service provider to reflect its limited-risk, cost-plus operating model. Diversified technology companies with broad service portfolios, substantial brand value and intangibles, significant research and development, goodwill, patents, and different risk profiles are functionally dissimilar. The absence of standalone segmental information further impairs reliable comparison. Infosys Ltd., Wipro Ltd. and LTI Mindtree Ltd. are therefore unsuitable comparables, requiring recomputation of any transfer-pricing adjustment after their exclusion.
Functional, asset and risk analysis requires comparables for a captive software development service provider to reflect its limited-risk, cost-plus operating model. Diversified technology companies with broad service portfolios, substantial brand value and intangibles, significant research and development, goodwill, patents, and different risk profiles are functionally dissimilar. The absence of standalone segmental information further impairs reliable comparison. Infosys Ltd., Wipro Ltd. and LTI Mindtree Ltd. are therefore unsuitable comparables, requiring recomputation of any transfer-pricing adjustment after their exclusion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.