Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Written acceptance of an enhanced customs assessable value does not waive an importer's statutory right to challenge reassessment; it may only dispense with the proper officer's obligation to issue a speaking order. Rule 12(2) requires the proper officer to form and communicate written grounds for reasonable doubt before rejecting the declared transaction value. Acceptance letters lacking particulars of alleged contemporaneous imports do not meet that requirement. NIDB data alone, without independent and cogent supporting material, cannot sustain rejection of declared value or enhancement. The enhanced values and appellate orders were unsustainable, and the appeals succeeded with consequential relief.
Written acceptance of an enhanced customs assessable value does not waive an importer's statutory right to challenge reassessment; it may only dispense with the proper officer's obligation to issue a speaking order. Rule 12(2) requires the proper officer to form and communicate written grounds for reasonable doubt before rejecting the declared transaction value. Acceptance letters lacking particulars of alleged contemporaneous imports do not meet that requirement. NIDB data alone, without independent and cogent supporting material, cannot sustain rejection of declared value or enhancement. The enhanced values and appellate orders were unsustainable, and the appeals succeeded with consequential relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
