Survey surrender characterisation determines whether mixed excess stock and business-linked cash face normal taxation or special deemed-income taxatio...
Recall jurisdiction cannot be used to reopen a concluded order on its merits merely by alleging fraud in a notarised affidavit. Rules governing affidavit attestation, form and evidentiary acceptability distinguish rectifiable defects from deception that materially affects a decision; where the affidavit's contents are not denied, an attestation defect alone does not establish fraud. Third-party impleadment in a disciplinary appeal requires a direct legal right affected by the relief sought. A non-party cannot seek limited impleadment only in a stay application while remaining outside the main appeal, consistent with the principle of dominus litis.
Recall jurisdiction cannot be used to reopen a concluded order on its merits merely by alleging fraud in a notarised affidavit. Rules governing affidavit attestation, form and evidentiary acceptability distinguish rectifiable defects from deception that materially affects a decision; where the affidavit's contents are not denied, an attestation defect alone does not establish fraud. Third-party impleadment in a disciplinary appeal requires a direct legal right affected by the relief sought. A non-party cannot seek limited impleadment only in a stay application while remaining outside the main appeal, consistent with the principle of dominus litis.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4905 
