Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
Page of 4912
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 98239 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Parallel proceedings under the CGST/UPGST Acts for the same goods and cause of action are impermissible where transit-release proceedings have already resulted in recovery of tax and penalty; the first appellate reduction of duplicated liability was therefore sustained. Goods in transit must carry a tax invoice and a valid e-way bill generated before movement begins. Manual invoices furnished more than three months after interception, without upload on the GST portal, lacked evidentiary credibility and could not retrospectively validate the movement or cure missing mandatory documentation. The taxpayer's appeal failed, while the partial liability reduction for duplicated proceedings remained intact.
Parallel proceedings under the CGST/UPGST Acts for the same goods and cause of action are impermissible where transit-release proceedings have already resulted in recovery of tax and penalty; the first appellate reduction of duplicated liability was therefore sustained. Goods in transit must carry a tax invoice and a valid e-way bill generated before movement begins. Manual invoices furnished more than three months after interception, without upload on the GST portal, lacked evidentiary credibility and could not retrospectively validate the movement or cure missing mandatory documentation. The taxpayer's appeal failed, while the partial liability reduction for duplicated proceedings remained intact.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4912 
