Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Locus standi to challenge search and seizure authorisation depends on whether the challenger is the affected person. Where a search is directed against a company, an Additional Director acting only in that capacity cannot maintain a personal challenge to the search or to the manner in which its authorisation was issued. The company is the affected entity for this purpose. The Additional Director may nevertheless appear in response to a summons; failure to do so leaves the authorities free to take measures permitted by law.
Locus standi to challenge search and seizure authorisation depends on whether the challenger is the affected person. Where a search is directed against a company, an Additional Director acting only in that capacity cannot maintain a personal challenge to the search or to the manner in which its authorisation was issued. The company is the affected entity for this purpose. The Additional Director may nevertheless appear in response to a summons; failure to do so leaves the authorities free to take measures permitted by law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
