Permanent establishment tests: independent subsidiary premises and principal-to-principal dealings did not create Indian taxability for offshore suppl...
Valuation Officer estimates govern property-value additions once statutory valuation is invoked, requiring fresh consideration of objections and compa...
Waiver of written show-cause notice may prevent a later procedural challenge after participation in customs adjudication, preserving statutory appella...
Retrospective invalidity of ocean-freight IGST supports refunds despite non-party status and prior credit utilisation, subject to authorised appeal gr...
Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Page of 4915
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 98300 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cash returned by builders from property payments made through banking channels constitutes circulation of explained funds, not unexplained money, unless evidence establishes a separate unexplained asset or accretion; the related addition was deleted. Alleged cash interest from builder financing was unsustainable where disclosed property investments, rent and capital gains supported appreciation rather than separate interest; that addition was deleted. Acquisition below stamp-duty value can attract section 56(2)(x)(b) irrespective of a transaction's builder-financing character, but disputed values require fair-market-value determination before taxability is decided; the issue was remanded. Set-off of brought-forward long-term capital loss was also remanded for verification of eligibility and the character of current-year capital gains.
Cash returned by builders from property payments made through banking channels constitutes circulation of explained funds, not unexplained money, unless evidence establishes a separate unexplained asset or accretion; the related addition was deleted. Alleged cash interest from builder financing was unsustainable where disclosed property investments, rent and capital gains supported appreciation rather than separate interest; that addition was deleted. Acquisition below stamp-duty value can attract section 56(2)(x)(b) irrespective of a transaction's builder-financing character, but disputed values require fair-market-value determination before taxability is decided; the issue was remanded. Set-off of brought-forward long-term capital loss was also remanded for verification of eligibility and the character of current-year capital gains.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
