Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Capital-gains liability under a development agreement requires factual verification where the sale deed and power of attorney indicate that the assessee acted only as the landowner's attorney holder. Because these documents were not produced before the lower authorities and required consideration alongside the Revenue's submissions, the liability was not decided on merits. The appellate order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration of the documents and submissions.
Capital-gains liability under a development agreement requires factual verification where the sale deed and power of attorney indicate that the assessee acted only as the landowner's attorney holder. Because these documents were not produced before the lower authorities and required consideration alongside the Revenue's submissions, the liability was not decided on merits. The appellate order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the CIT(A) for fresh consideration of the documents and submissions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.