Retrospective invalidity of ocean-freight IGST supports refunds despite non-party status and prior credit utilisation, subject to authorised appeal gr...
Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or o...
TNMM comparability using audited accounts and working-capital adjustments can eliminate unwarranted transfer-pricing additions where verified margins ...
Gross-profit additions on disputed purchases require reasoned appellate determination; disclosed claims alone do not support inaccurate-particulars pe...
Limitation after transfer-pricing remand: fresh TPO reference did not extend the assessment deadline, rendering the consequential assessment time-barr...
Page of 4913
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 98250 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Assignment and transfer for consideration of leasehold rights in industrial plots allotted by GIDC constitute transfer of benefits arising from immovable property and are not subject to GST. The jurisdictional High Court's ruling on that characterisation remained binding on the Tribunal absent a stay or recall. The department's stated intention to seek review did not diminish the ruling's binding effect. Accordingly, GST was not leviable on the assignments, and the departmental appeals were dismissed.
Assignment and transfer for consideration of leasehold rights in industrial plots allotted by GIDC constitute transfer of benefits arising from immovable property and are not subject to GST. The jurisdictional High Court's ruling on that characterisation remained binding on the Tribunal absent a stay or recall. The department's stated intention to seek review did not diminish the ruling's binding effect. Accordingly, GST was not leviable on the assignments, and the departmental appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4913 
