Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
Section 170A(2)(a) limits a modified return filed after business...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer-pricing proceedings.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 170A(2)(a) limits a modified return filed after business reorganisation, where assessment or reassessment had already concluded, to adjusting total income to implement the reorganisation. It does not permit the modified return to be treated as a return under section 139 or to initiate fresh scrutiny under section 143(2); information may be sought only to verify implementation. Transfer-pricing jurisdiction initiated on the premise of valid pending scrutiny does not survive if that scrutiny notice lacks authority. A writ challenging the assumption of statutory jurisdiction remains maintainable despite assessment participation or an appellate remedy. The scrutiny and consequential transfer-pricing proceedings were quashed.
Section 170A(2)(a) limits a modified return filed after business reorganisation, where assessment or reassessment had already concluded, to adjusting total income to implement the reorganisation. It does not permit the modified return to be treated as a return under section 139 or to initiate fresh scrutiny under section 143(2); information may be sought only to verify implementation. Transfer-pricing jurisdiction initiated on the premise of valid pending scrutiny does not survive if that scrutiny notice lacks authority. A writ challenging the assumption of statutory jurisdiction remains maintainable despite assessment participation or an appellate remedy. The scrutiny and consequential transfer-pricing proceedings were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.