Head Office cost allocation requires prescribed transfer-pricing methods; treaty ceilings bar surcharge and cess, while duplicate taxation is excluded...
Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Page of 4902
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 98021 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Third-party loose sheets may trigger investigation but cannot,...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or ownership.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Third-party loose sheets may trigger investigation but cannot, without reliable evidence linking the assessee to the recorded transaction, prove unexplained expenditure. Presumptions attached to seized documents apply to the person from whose possession or control they are recovered; they do not establish the alleged payer, source or movement of funds. Actual incurrence is foundational, so an uncorroborated allegation cannot shift the burden of proof. Nor does a third-party reference establish ownership of unrecorded money; the statutory requirements for unexplained money and expenditure are distinct. These deficiencies made both additions unsustainable. Evaluation of material already on the assessment record does not amount to admitting additional evidence.
Third-party loose sheets may trigger investigation but cannot, without reliable evidence linking the assessee to the recorded transaction, prove unexplained expenditure. Presumptions attached to seized documents apply to the person from whose possession or control they are recovered; they do not establish the alleged payer, source or movement of funds. Actual incurrence is foundational, so an uncorroborated allegation cannot shift the burden of proof. Nor does a third-party reference establish ownership of unrecorded money; the statutory requirements for unexplained money and expenditure are distinct. These deficiencies made both additions unsustainable. Evaluation of material already on the assessment record does not amount to admitting additional evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.