Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Scientific research association approval requires continuing SIRO status, annual donation reporting, and donor certificates for the approved foundatio...
Scientific research institution approval is conditional on SIRO recognition, annual donation reporting, donor certification, and prescribed compliance...
Section 129DD permits the revisional authority to annul or modify an appellate customs order and, absent an express prohibition, remit confiscation and redemption proceedings for fresh adjudication. Revisional review may correct an appellate finding that overlooks material evidence, including circumstances relevant to a purchase invoice and the claimant's burden to prove lawful import, without finally deciding redemption or confiscation. A separate show-cause notice is required only for enhancement of penalty or fine or confiscation of goods of greater value; it is unnecessary for remand where the affected party has been heard. Statutory revision time limits cannot be enlarged under the Limitation Act, but a limitation challenge fails where the communication date is unproved. The writ petition was dismissed and remand sustained.
Section 129DD permits the revisional authority to annul or modify an appellate customs order and, absent an express prohibition, remit confiscation and redemption proceedings for fresh adjudication. Revisional review may correct an appellate finding that overlooks material evidence, including circumstances relevant to a purchase invoice and the claimant's burden to prove lawful import, without finally deciding redemption or confiscation. A separate show-cause notice is required only for enhancement of penalty or fine or confiscation of goods of greater value; it is unnecessary for remand where the affected party has been heard. Statutory revision time limits cannot be enlarged under the Limitation Act, but a limitation challenge fails where the communication date is unproved. The writ petition was dismissed and remand sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.