Income Declaration Scheme declarations can evidence share-capital sources, while round-tripped funds and cash-linked credits require further verificat...
Permanent establishment tests: independent subsidiary premises and principal-to-principal dealings did not create Indian taxability for offshore suppl...
Valuation Officer estimates govern property-value additions once statutory valuation is invoked, requiring fresh consideration of objections and compa...
Waiver of written show-cause notice may prevent a later procedural challenge after participation in customs adjudication, preserving statutory appella...
Retrospective invalidity of ocean-freight IGST supports refunds despite non-party status and prior credit utilisation, subject to authorised appeal gr...
Page of 4902
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 98028 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 32A(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code ends a corporate debtor's liability for offences committed before commencement of CIRP once an approved resolution plan results in a qualifying change in management or control. The immunity can protect a successor company that takes over and amalgamates with the former corporate debtor, preventing civil or criminal liability for the predecessor's pre-CIRP acts, including alleged Air Act offences. Its application is company-specific: proceedings may be quashed against the protected successor without affecting prosecution of the remaining accused.
Section 32A(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code ends a corporate debtor's liability for offences committed before commencement of CIRP once an approved resolution plan results in a qualifying change in management or control. The immunity can protect a successor company that takes over and amalgamates with the former corporate debtor, preventing civil or criminal liability for the predecessor's pre-CIRP acts, including alleged Air Act offences. Its application is company-specific: proceedings may be quashed against the protected successor without affecting prosecution of the remaining accused.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.