Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or o...
TNMM comparability using audited accounts and working-capital adjustments can eliminate unwarranted transfer-pricing additions where verified margins ...
Gross-profit additions on disputed purchases require reasoned appellate determination; disclosed claims alone do not support inaccurate-particulars pe...
Limitation after transfer-pricing remand: fresh TPO reference did not extend the assessment deadline, rendering the consequential assessment time-barr...
Interim judicial restraint on tax deduction prevents default, while supporting reasonable cause and penalty deletion for foreign-leg LFC reimbursement...
Page of 4902
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 98028 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Tribunal leave is mandatory for continuation of a pending suit by or against a company in liquidation. Where joint reliefs are sought against the company and a co-defendant, the claimant cannot maintain the suit or appeal by deleting the company from the parties. The liquidator must be served and represented in proceedings involving the company in liquidation. The commercial judgment was set aside, and the suit was remitted for fresh consideration only if leave is obtained from the Tribunal to continue proceedings against the company.
Tribunal leave is mandatory for continuation of a pending suit by or against a company in liquidation. Where joint reliefs are sought against the company and a co-defendant, the claimant cannot maintain the suit or appeal by deleting the company from the parties. The liquidator must be served and represented in proceedings involving the company in liquidation. The commercial judgment was set aside, and the suit was remitted for fresh consideration only if leave is obtained from the Tribunal to continue proceedings against the company.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.