Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or o...
TNMM comparability using audited accounts and working-capital adjustments can eliminate unwarranted transfer-pricing additions where verified margins ...
Gross-profit additions on disputed purchases require reasoned appellate determination; disclosed claims alone do not support inaccurate-particulars pe...
Limitation after transfer-pricing remand: fresh TPO reference did not extend the assessment deadline, rendering the consequential assessment time-barr...
Interim judicial restraint on tax deduction prevents default, while supporting reasonable cause and penalty deletion for foreign-leg LFC reimbursement...
Page of 4902
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 98028 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Jurisdiction over an amalgamating company ends when it ceases to exist following amalgamation. A section 201 order issued and served in the former company's name, despite prior notification to the TDS authority, suffers a jurisdictional defect; referring to the successor company in the body of the order does not cure it. The order was void ab initio and quashed, while the issue of interest under section 201(1A) remained academic.
Jurisdiction over an amalgamating company ends when it ceases to exist following amalgamation. A section 201 order issued and served in the former company's name, despite prior notification to the TDS authority, suffers a jurisdictional defect; referring to the successor company in the body of the order does not cure it. The order was void ab initio and quashed, while the issue of interest under section 201(1A) remained academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4902 
