Head Office cost allocation requires prescribed transfer-pricing methods; treaty ceilings bar surcharge and cess, while duplicate taxation is excluded...
Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Page of 4908
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 98141 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For specified domestic transactions, market value constitutes the arm's length price, with the special rule in the Explanation to section 80A(6) prevailing over the general provision. Regulated tariffs at which generating companies supply distribution licensees are not comparable uncontrolled prices because they are not negotiated in uncontrolled conditions. The cement unit's purchase rate from its distribution licensee was the more reliable internal comparable for captive electricity transfers; functional differences did not alter that comparison, and a mark-up on an average price was unsustainable. The transfer-pricing adjustment was deleted and the related deduction allowed. A challenge solely to initiation of penalty proceedings was dismissed as premature.
For specified domestic transactions, market value constitutes the arm's length price, with the special rule in the Explanation to section 80A(6) prevailing over the general provision. Regulated tariffs at which generating companies supply distribution licensees are not comparable uncontrolled prices because they are not negotiated in uncontrolled conditions. The cement unit's purchase rate from its distribution licensee was the more reliable internal comparable for captive electricity transfers; functional differences did not alter that comparison, and a mark-up on an average price was unsustainable. The transfer-pricing adjustment was deleted and the related deduction allowed. A challenge solely to initiation of penalty proceedings was dismissed as premature.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.