Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or o...
TNMM comparability using audited accounts and working-capital adjustments can eliminate unwarranted transfer-pricing additions where verified margins ...
Gross-profit additions on disputed purchases require reasoned appellate determination; disclosed claims alone do not support inaccurate-particulars pe...
Limitation after transfer-pricing remand: fresh TPO reference did not extend the assessment deadline, rendering the consequential assessment time-barr...
Interim judicial restraint on tax deduction prevents default, while supporting reasonable cause and penalty deletion for foreign-leg LFC reimbursement...
Palmolein classification defeated the crude-oil concession; material misdeclaration sustained recovery and confiscation, while separate false-document...
Prescription of a timeframe for deciding applications to cancel...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the request.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Prescription of a timeframe for deciding applications to cancel or surrender duplicate PANs was referred to CBDT for initial consideration because no prior representation had stated the grounds for such a timeframe. The petitioner may submit a detailed representation; CBDT must decide it in accordance with law within eight weeks of receipt and communicate the decision.
Prescription of a timeframe for deciding applications to cancel or surrender duplicate PANs was referred to CBDT for initial consideration because no prior representation had stated the grounds for such a timeframe. The petitioner may submit a detailed representation; CBDT must decide it in accordance with law within eight weeks of receipt and communicate the decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4908 
