Head Office cost allocation requires prescribed transfer-pricing methods; treaty ceilings bar surcharge and cess, while duplicate taxation is excluded...
Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Page of 4907
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 98136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Known departmental attachments in a SARFAESI auction constitute encumbrances where entered in the encumbrance certificate and restrict alienation, transfer and further charges. Rules 9(6) to 9(10) require disclosure of known encumbrances and allow delivery free of them only after deposit of the amount required for discharge. Secured-creditor priority over Government dues governs recovery of secured debt but does not displace that mandatory sale procedure. Accordingly, a disclosed departmental attachment cannot be removed from the encumbrance certificate, nor can an auction purchaser avoid the associated dues, unless they are discharged. A secured creditor is not functus officio while any part of its debt remains unrecovered and enforcement continues.
Known departmental attachments in a SARFAESI auction constitute encumbrances where entered in the encumbrance certificate and restrict alienation, transfer and further charges. Rules 9(6) to 9(10) require disclosure of known encumbrances and allow delivery free of them only after deposit of the amount required for discharge. Secured-creditor priority over Government dues governs recovery of secured debt but does not displace that mandatory sale procedure. Accordingly, a disclosed departmental attachment cannot be removed from the encumbrance certificate, nor can an auction purchaser avoid the associated dues, unless they are discharged. A secured creditor is not functus officio while any part of its debt remains unrecovered and enforcement continues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.