Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or o...
TNMM comparability using audited accounts and working-capital adjustments can eliminate unwarranted transfer-pricing additions where verified margins ...
Gross-profit additions on disputed purchases require reasoned appellate determination; disclosed claims alone do not support inaccurate-particulars pe...
Limitation after transfer-pricing remand: fresh TPO reference did not extend the assessment deadline, rendering the consequential assessment time-barr...
Interim judicial restraint on tax deduction prevents default, while supporting reasonable cause and penalty deletion for foreign-leg LFC reimbursement...
Palmolein classification defeated the crude-oil concession; material misdeclaration sustained recovery and confiscation, while separate false-document...
Recording satisfaction during assessment proceedings is required before penalty for an alleged cash-receipt contravention of section 269SS can be validly initiated. Applying the Supreme Court principle in Jai Laxmi Rice Mills, the Tribunal treated the absence of any satisfaction or penalty initiation in the assessment order as an invalid assumption of jurisdiction. It deleted the penalty under section 271D without deciding whether section 269SS applied to cash sale consideration for immovable property.
Recording satisfaction during assessment proceedings is required before penalty for an alleged cash-receipt contravention of section 269SS can be validly initiated. Applying the Supreme Court principle in Jai Laxmi Rice Mills, the Tribunal treated the absence of any satisfaction or penalty initiation in the assessment order as an invalid assumption of jurisdiction. It deleted the penalty under section 271D without deciding whether section 269SS applied to cash sale consideration for immovable property.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.