Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The Faceless Penalty Scheme SOP assigns Chapter XXI penalty proceedings to the Penalty Unit. Once the Penalty Unit became operational, the transitional arrangement allowing the Assessment Unit to act as the Penalty Unit ceased to apply. Accordingly, the Assessment Unit lacked jurisdiction to impose penalties under section 271D for alleged cash contributions accepted from members. Penalty orders issued by the Assessment Unit after operationalisation of the Penalty Unit were quashed for want of jurisdiction, rendering the remaining grounds academic.
The Faceless Penalty Scheme SOP assigns Chapter XXI penalty proceedings to the Penalty Unit. Once the Penalty Unit became operational, the transitional arrangement allowing the Assessment Unit to act as the Penalty Unit ceased to apply. Accordingly, the Assessment Unit lacked jurisdiction to impose penalties under section 271D for alleged cash contributions accepted from members. Penalty orders issued by the Assessment Unit after operationalisation of the Penalty Unit were quashed for want of jurisdiction, rendering the remaining grounds academic.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
