Delayed judgment pronouncement alone does not invalidate Tribunal orders, while rectification cannot reopen evidence or negate confiscation-related pe...
Agricultural-land reinvestment qualifies when transfer consideration precedes replacement purchase, while unexamined claims may be reassessed on escap...
Bona fide public fixed-deposit explanations prevent concealment penalties where unexplained-credit additions lack independent evidence of undisclosed ...
Prima facie substance in a limitation challenge to reassessment, coupled with a high-pitched assessment, warranted unconditional protection from recovery pending appeal. The stay-rejection order failed to address the taxpayer's material contentions solely because an appeal was pending. Financial capacity could not be inferred from gross turnover without considering returned income. The rejection was set aside, recovery of the reassessment demand was stayed until appeal disposal, and the appellate authority was to determine the appeal independently and expeditiously on its merits.
Prima facie substance in a limitation challenge to reassessment, coupled with a high-pitched assessment, warranted unconditional protection from recovery pending appeal. The stay-rejection order failed to address the taxpayer's material contentions solely because an appeal was pending. Financial capacity could not be inferred from gross turnover without considering returned income. The rejection was set aside, recovery of the reassessment demand was stayed until appeal disposal, and the appellate authority was to determine the appeal independently and expeditiously on its merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4905 
