Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Functional, asset and risk analysis excludes diversified technology companies from captive software development comparables under cost-plus arrangemen...
Embezzlement losses incurred by a charitable blood bank may be...
Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefit.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Embezzlement losses incurred by a charitable blood bank may be allowed where detailed FIR allegations and the institution's conduct establish misappropriation, even if criminal proceedings have not reached a final outcome. Misappropriation by persons managing the institution does not, merely for that reason, constitute a benefit to specified persons. Where the resulting loss is absolute or irrecoverable, disallowance on the basis of an alleged benefit to specified persons is not warranted. The disallowance of the claimed embezzlement loss was deleted.
Embezzlement losses incurred by a charitable blood bank may be allowed where detailed FIR allegations and the institution's conduct establish misappropriation, even if criminal proceedings have not reached a final outcome. Misappropriation by persons managing the institution does not, merely for that reason, constitute a benefit to specified persons. Where the resulting loss is absolute or irrecoverable, disallowance on the basis of an alleged benefit to specified persons is not warranted. The disallowance of the claimed embezzlement loss was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.