Gross-profit additions on disputed purchases require reasoned appellate determination; disclosed claims alone do not support inaccurate-particulars pe...
Limitation after transfer-pricing remand: fresh TPO reference did not extend the assessment deadline, rendering the consequential assessment time-barr...
Interim judicial restraint on tax deduction prevents default, while supporting reasonable cause and penalty deletion for foreign-leg LFC reimbursement...
Palmolein classification defeated the crude-oil concession; material misdeclaration sustained recovery and confiscation, while separate false-document...
Service of a reassessment notice by affixture at an address differing from that in the registered sale deed requires proof of due diligence, confirmation of the correct property, and verification by local witnesses or neighbours. Without those safeguards, substituted service is invalid and section 292BB does not preclude an objection to defective service. Reassessment proceedings cannot validly commence where the notice has not been properly served.
Service of a reassessment notice by affixture at an address differing from that in the registered sale deed requires proof of due diligence, confirmation of the correct property, and verification by local witnesses or neighbours. Without those safeguards, substituted service is invalid and section 292BB does not preclude an objection to defective service. Reassessment proceedings cannot validly commence where the notice has not been properly served.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.