Business support recruitment and training receipts qualify for presumptive business taxation, not professional taxation under technical consultancy ru...
Treaty exemption for foreign permanent-establishment management fees prevailed, while dividend expense disallowance remained limited to an accepted al...
Centralised assessment transfers: participation after requesting centralisation can bar technical jurisdictional challenges, while assessment disputes...
Binding precedent remains operative despite pending challenge, supporting deletion of interest disallowance when debt is converted into preference sha...
Membership thresholds for oppression and mismanagement...
Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require proof.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Membership thresholds for oppression and mismanagement proceedings in a company without share capital may be met through written consents exceeding one-fifth of eligible voting members where the voter list underlying those consents remains unchallenged. A later precautionary waiver application does not render the petition incompetent once the threshold is independently satisfied. A party alleging that consents are forged or invalid bears the burden of proof and cannot require suo motu forensic verification without supporting material or testimony. The membership requirement operates as a discretionary safeguard against frivolous proceedings, warrants purposive construction, and does not permit merits-based adjudication at the waiver stage.
Membership thresholds for oppression and mismanagement proceedings in a company without share capital may be met through written consents exceeding one-fifth of eligible voting members where the voter list underlying those consents remains unchallenged. A later precautionary waiver application does not render the petition incompetent once the threshold is independently satisfied. A party alleging that consents are forged or invalid bears the burden of proof and cannot require suo motu forensic verification without supporting material or testimony. The membership requirement operates as a discretionary safeguard against frivolous proceedings, warrants purposive construction, and does not permit merits-based adjudication at the waiver stage.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.