Constitutional personal-liberty safeguards limit PMLA twin bail conditions where completed investigations lead to prolonged incarceration before trial...
Automated airline software subscriptions without human intervention fail technical-services characterisation and do not make available underlying tech...
Business support recruitment and training receipts qualify for presumptive business taxation, not professional taxation under technical consultancy ru...
Treaty exemption for foreign permanent-establishment management fees prevailed, while dividend expense disallowance remained limited to an accepted al...
Centralised assessment transfers: participation after requesting centralisation can bar technical jurisdictional challenges, while assessment disputes...
Binding precedent remains operative despite pending challenge, supporting deletion of interest disallowance when debt is converted into preference sha...
Page of 4912
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 98239 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Clandestine manufacture and clearance allegations require sufficient tangible evidence establishing a reliable chain from unaccounted inputs and production to transport, buyers and receipt of sale proceeds. Loose handwritten sheets, WhatsApp printouts, Tally data and transporter records maintained or recovered from third parties cannot substantiate a demand unless their authorship, provenance, custody, preservation, integrity and nexus with the manufacturer are proved. Unretracted statements showing a marketing or distribution connection do not remedy defects in electronic evidence. Inferences drawn through assumed material consumption, manufacture and removal are impermissible successive presumptions. Unverified records may justify further investigation but cannot, without independent corroboration, sustain duty, interest or penalties.
Clandestine manufacture and clearance allegations require sufficient tangible evidence establishing a reliable chain from unaccounted inputs and production to transport, buyers and receipt of sale proceeds. Loose handwritten sheets, WhatsApp printouts, Tally data and transporter records maintained or recovered from third parties cannot substantiate a demand unless their authorship, provenance, custody, preservation, integrity and nexus with the manufacturer are proved. Unretracted statements showing a marketing or distribution connection do not remedy defects in electronic evidence. Inferences drawn through assumed material consumption, manufacture and removal are impermissible successive presumptions. Unverified records may justify further investigation but cannot, without independent corroboration, sustain duty, interest or penalties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.