Valuation Officer estimates govern property-value additions once statutory valuation is invoked, requiring fresh consideration of objections and compa...
Waiver of written show-cause notice may prevent a later procedural challenge after participation in customs adjudication, preserving statutory appella...
Retrospective invalidity of ocean-freight IGST supports refunds despite non-party status and prior credit utilisation, subject to authorised appeal gr...
Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or o...
TNMM comparability using audited accounts and working-capital adjustments can eliminate unwarranted transfer-pricing additions where verified margins ...
Stayed disciplinary punishment pending appeal does not, by...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of disciplinary proceedings.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Stayed disciplinary punishment pending appeal does not, by itself, make an applicant unfit or improper for insolvency professional registration. Where an order removing the applicant from the professional register is kept in abeyance, the applicant remains registered and entitled to perform professional duties; mere pendency of disciplinary proceedings cannot justify refusal of enrolment-cum-registration. The rejection requires fresh consideration without reliance on the pending appeal, while remaining subject to its final outcome.
Stayed disciplinary punishment pending appeal does not, by itself, make an applicant unfit or improper for insolvency professional registration. Where an order removing the applicant from the professional register is kept in abeyance, the applicant remains registered and entitled to perform professional duties; mere pendency of disciplinary proceedings cannot justify refusal of enrolment-cum-registration. The rejection requires fresh consideration without reliance on the pending appeal, while remaining subject to its final outcome.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4910 
