Constitutional personal-liberty safeguards limit PMLA twin bail conditions where completed investigations lead to prolonged incarceration before trial...
Automated airline software subscriptions without human intervention fail technical-services characterisation and do not make available underlying tech...
Business support recruitment and training receipts qualify for presumptive business taxation, not professional taxation under technical consultancy ru...
Treaty exemption for foreign permanent-establishment management fees prevailed, while dividend expense disallowance remained limited to an accepted al...
Centralised assessment transfers: participation after requesting centralisation can bar technical jurisdictional challenges, while assessment disputes...
Binding precedent remains operative despite pending challenge, supporting deletion of interest disallowance when debt is converted into preference sha...
Page of 4912
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 98239 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Failure to pay under a one-time settlement does not create a fresh default for corporate insolvency purposes; a failed settlement restores the original loan position rather than rescheduling it. The recovery-certificate date may therefore govern default, while debt acknowledgments can preserve limitation and prevent the statutory insolvency bar from applying. Incorrect default-date particulars in Form I and other defects that affect neither jurisdiction nor merits may be rectified, including through additional documents. A corporate debtor's asserted viability does not preclude admission without credible evidence of solvency or viability where financial debt and default above the statutory threshold are undisputed. An admission order is reasoned where it records material, contentions, and grounds for admission.
Failure to pay under a one-time settlement does not create a fresh default for corporate insolvency purposes; a failed settlement restores the original loan position rather than rescheduling it. The recovery-certificate date may therefore govern default, while debt acknowledgments can preserve limitation and prevent the statutory insolvency bar from applying. Incorrect default-date particulars in Form I and other defects that affect neither jurisdiction nor merits may be rectified, including through additional documents. A corporate debtor's asserted viability does not preclude admission without credible evidence of solvency or viability where financial debt and default above the statutory threshold are undisputed. An admission order is reasoned where it records material, contentions, and grounds for admission.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.