Separate speaking orders on reopening objections are mandatory; deciding them within reassessment invalidates jurisdiction and precludes revival of st...
Page of 4912
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
521 to 540 of 98239 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Consent terms filed jointly in oppression and mismanagement proceedings were incorporated into the appellate disposition, making the settlement binding on the parties' inter se rights, liabilities and conduct. The appeal challenging findings that amendments to the articles of association and a rights issue were oppressive was allowed by consent, and those portions of the impugned order were quashed. No independent adjudication of the challenged merits occurred.
Consent terms filed jointly in oppression and mismanagement proceedings were incorporated into the appellate disposition, making the settlement binding on the parties' inter se rights, liabilities and conduct. The appeal challenging findings that amendments to the articles of association and a rights issue were oppressive was allowed by consent, and those portions of the impugned order were quashed. No independent adjudication of the challenged merits occurred.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.