Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Functional, asset and risk analysis excludes diversified technology companies from captive software development comparables under cost-plus arrangemen...
Mobile-phone electronic evidence failed to establish customs undervaluation, while duty survived on non-authentic origin certificates without importer...
Automotive radio classification treats integrated infotainment features as supplementary, placing complete and qualifying unassembled units under the ...
Separate corporate personality prevents directors from being personally liable for company deposits without a guarantee or independent legal undertaki...
Unverified Insight Portal information cannot justify...
Unverified Insight Portal Information Cannot Justify Reassessment Without a Verified Taxpayer-Specific Income-Escape Nexus or Demonstrated Application of Mind
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Unverified Insight Portal information cannot justify reassessment where it does not identify any transaction linking the taxpayer to alleged escaped income. Reassessment must rest on material demonstrating a taxpayer-specific nexus and application of mind; it cannot be used for a roving and fishing inquiry. Where the underlying material is not supplied, the alleged-beneficiary chart identifies no attributable transaction, and the Assessing Officer does not verify the information's genuineness, the reassessment notice and order under section 148A(3) lack a valid foundation. The reassessment proceedings were quashed and the writ petition was allowed.
Unverified Insight Portal information cannot justify reassessment where it does not identify any transaction linking the taxpayer to alleged escaped income. Reassessment must rest on material demonstrating a taxpayer-specific nexus and application of mind; it cannot be used for a roving and fishing inquiry. Where the underlying material is not supplied, the alleged-beneficiary chart identifies no attributable transaction, and the Assessing Officer does not verify the information's genuineness, the reassessment notice and order under section 148A(3) lack a valid foundation. The reassessment proceedings were quashed and the writ petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
