Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Functional, asset and risk analysis excludes diversified technology companies from captive software development comparables under cost-plus arrangemen...
Unverified Insight Portal information cannot justify...
Unverified Insight Portal Information Cannot Justify Reassessment Without a Verified Taxpayer-Specific Income-Escape Nexus or Demonstrated Application of Mind
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Unverified Insight Portal information cannot justify reassessment where it does not identify any transaction linking the taxpayer to alleged escaped income. Reassessment must rest on material demonstrating a taxpayer-specific nexus and application of mind; it cannot be used for a roving and fishing inquiry. Where the underlying material is not supplied, the alleged-beneficiary chart identifies no attributable transaction, and the Assessing Officer does not verify the information's genuineness, the reassessment notice and order under section 148A(3) lack a valid foundation. The reassessment proceedings were quashed and the writ petition was allowed.
Unverified Insight Portal information cannot justify reassessment where it does not identify any transaction linking the taxpayer to alleged escaped income. Reassessment must rest on material demonstrating a taxpayer-specific nexus and application of mind; it cannot be used for a roving and fishing inquiry. Where the underlying material is not supplied, the alleged-beneficiary chart identifies no attributable transaction, and the Assessing Officer does not verify the information's genuineness, the reassessment notice and order under section 148A(3) lack a valid foundation. The reassessment proceedings were quashed and the writ petition was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4913 
