Stock-in-trade transfer taxability follows possession and consideration, not later conveyance registration, limiting deemed-value provisions to the ac...
Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Deletion of a negative working-capital adjustment in...
Consequential appeal-effect orders must implement rectification deleting working-capital adjustments and reconsider the resulting arm's-length range claim.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Deletion of a negative working-capital adjustment in rectification proceedings required implementation through a consequential appeal-effect order. The Assessing Officer was required to consider whether, after that deletion, the taxpayer's margin fell within the permissible arm's-length range and could reach a contrary conclusion only after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The appeal-effect order was directed to be passed within 15 days, with liberty to seek revival if the consequential order caused grievance.
Deletion of a negative working-capital adjustment in rectification proceedings required implementation through a consequential appeal-effect order. The Assessing Officer was required to consider whether, after that deletion, the taxpayer's margin fell within the permissible arm's-length range and could reach a contrary conclusion only after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing. The appeal-effect order was directed to be passed within 15 days, with liberty to seek revival if the consequential order caused grievance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.