COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Section 153C jurisdiction requires timely deemed search and assessee-specific satisfaction material; otherwise reassessment must use the proper statut...
Page of 4915
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 98300 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rectification jurisdiction permits correction only of a patent, manifest or self-evident error, not reassessment of evidence or review of an earlier view. Claims that additions for alleged on-money receipts failed to consider seized material, related orders, a co-ordinate Bench decision and precedents on income extrapolation did not establish a mistake apparent from the record where those materials had been considered. The rectification applications therefore amounted to an impermissible review and were dismissed.
Rectification jurisdiction permits correction only of a patent, manifest or self-evident error, not reassessment of evidence or review of an earlier view. Claims that additions for alleged on-money receipts failed to consider seized material, related orders, a co-ordinate Bench decision and precedents on income extrapolation did not establish a mistake apparent from the record where those materials had been considered. The rectification applications therefore amounted to an impermissible review and were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.