Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Rectification jurisdiction permits correction only of a patent, manifest or self-evident error, not reassessment of evidence or review of an earlier view. Claims that additions for alleged on-money receipts failed to consider seized material, related orders, a co-ordinate Bench decision and precedents on income extrapolation did not establish a mistake apparent from the record where those materials had been considered. The rectification applications therefore amounted to an impermissible review and were dismissed.
Rectification jurisdiction permits correction only of a patent, manifest or self-evident error, not reassessment of evidence or review of an earlier view. Claims that additions for alleged on-money receipts failed to consider seized material, related orders, a co-ordinate Bench decision and precedents on income extrapolation did not establish a mistake apparent from the record where those materials had been considered. The rectification applications therefore amounted to an impermissible review and were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
