Centralised assessment transfers: participation after requesting centralisation can bar technical jurisdictional challenges, while assessment disputes...
Binding precedent remains operative despite pending challenge, supporting deletion of interest disallowance when debt is converted into preference sha...
First-motion scrutiny of a listed-company amalgamation scheme is generally confined to legality and public interest, leaving shareholders and creditors to assess the commercial proposal. An ante-dated appointed date requires justification, but its assessment must account for the regulatory and stock-exchange approval process applicable to listed entities. Delay in filing cannot be attributed to the company unless exclusively caused by its failure or default; valuation effects and delay may be examined at the second stage with regulatory and tax-authority input. The first-motion dismissal was set aside, and meetings were directed to be convened through appointment of a chairman and scrutinizers.
First-motion scrutiny of a listed-company amalgamation scheme is generally confined to legality and public interest, leaving shareholders and creditors to assess the commercial proposal. An ante-dated appointed date requires justification, but its assessment must account for the regulatory and stock-exchange approval process applicable to listed entities. Delay in filing cannot be attributed to the company unless exclusively caused by its failure or default; valuation effects and delay may be examined at the second stage with regulatory and tax-authority input. The first-motion dismissal was set aside, and meetings were directed to be convened through appointment of a chairman and scrutinizers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
