Permanent establishment tests: independent subsidiary premises and principal-to-principal dealings did not create Indian taxability for offshore suppl...
Valuation Officer estimates govern property-value additions once statutory valuation is invoked, requiring fresh consideration of objections and compa...
Waiver of written show-cause notice may prevent a later procedural challenge after participation in customs adjudication, preserving statutory appella...
Retrospective invalidity of ocean-freight IGST supports refunds despite non-party status and prior credit utilisation, subject to authorised appeal gr...
Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Page of 4915
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 98300 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Fraud-classification action cannot rest solely on a forensic...
Fraud classification show-cause notices founded on inconclusive forensic audit material cannot sustain action, permitting fresh proceedings on conclusive evidence.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Fraud-classification action cannot rest solely on a forensic audit report that is inconclusive, based on limited lender-provided material, and qualified because complete records were unavailable. Where the borrower is in CIRP and liquidation, the erstwhile management lacks control and relevant books and records may be seized, reinforcing the report's evidentiary limitations. A show cause notice founded on the same report previously treated as inconclusive in relation to the lead bank remains defective despite the borrower filing a reply. The fraud-classification notice, resulting order, and consequential action were set aside, while fresh action on conclusive evidentiary material remains open.
Fraud-classification action cannot rest solely on a forensic audit report that is inconclusive, based on limited lender-provided material, and qualified because complete records were unavailable. Where the borrower is in CIRP and liquidation, the erstwhile management lacks control and relevant books and records may be seized, reinforcing the report's evidentiary limitations. A show cause notice founded on the same report previously treated as inconclusive in relation to the lead bank remains defective despite the borrower filing a reply. The fraud-classification notice, resulting order, and consequential action were set aside, while fresh action on conclusive evidentiary material remains open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
