Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Page of 4913
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1101 to 1120 of 98250 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment notice describing an assessee both as the searched person and as a non-searched person was invalid because it failed to identify the basis on which reassessment was initiated, demonstrating non-application of mind. Approval for reassessment was also invalid where the escaped-income amount in the approval materially differed from the amount in the recorded reasons, showing that the approving authority had not properly considered the proposal. The assessment order was consequently quashed, while remaining grounds were left open.
Reassessment notice describing an assessee both as the searched person and as a non-searched person was invalid because it failed to identify the basis on which reassessment was initiated, demonstrating non-application of mind. Approval for reassessment was also invalid where the escaped-income amount in the approval materially differed from the amount in the recorded reasons, showing that the approving authority had not properly considered the proposal. The assessment order was consequently quashed, while remaining grounds were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.