Head Office cost allocation requires prescribed transfer-pricing methods; treaty ceilings bar surcharge and cess, while duplicate taxation is excluded...
Cost-to-cost reimbursement of seconded employees is not service consideration; transfer-pricing markup was deleted and amalgamation amortisation allow...
Crystallisation of liability supports prior-period expense deduction, while functionally distinct divisions require separate transfer-pricing benchmar...
Reassessment notice describing an assessee both as the searched person and as a non-searched person was invalid because it failed to identify the basis on which reassessment was initiated, demonstrating non-application of mind. Approval for reassessment was also invalid where the escaped-income amount in the approval materially differed from the amount in the recorded reasons, showing that the approving authority had not properly considered the proposal. The assessment order was consequently quashed, while remaining grounds were left open.
Reassessment notice describing an assessee both as the searched person and as a non-searched person was invalid because it failed to identify the basis on which reassessment was initiated, demonstrating non-application of mind. Approval for reassessment was also invalid where the escaped-income amount in the approval materially differed from the amount in the recorded reasons, showing that the approving authority had not properly considered the proposal. The assessment order was consequently quashed, while remaining grounds were left open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.