Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Article 227 review permits intervention in arbitration only for manifest, patent inherent jurisdictional defects, not representational authority dispu...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment under sections 148A(b) and 148A(d) requires the reasons recorded for reopening to correspond with the information and grounds put to the assessee for explanation. Where a notice treated land as undisclosed and an unexplained investment, but the subsequent satisfaction accepted its disclosure and instead questioned the source of acquisition funds, the basis of reopening changed completely. Fresh or supplementary reasons cannot sustain reassessment without prior notice under section 148A(b). The Tribunal therefore quashed the reassessment, leaving the merits of the addition unadjudicated.
Reassessment under sections 148A(b) and 148A(d) requires the reasons recorded for reopening to correspond with the information and grounds put to the assessee for explanation. Where a notice treated land as undisclosed and an unexplained investment, but the subsequent satisfaction accepted its disclosure and instead questioned the source of acquisition funds, the basis of reopening changed completely. Fresh or supplementary reasons cannot sustain reassessment without prior notice under section 148A(b). The Tribunal therefore quashed the reassessment, leaving the merits of the addition unadjudicated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
