Delayed judgment pronouncement alone does not invalidate Tribunal orders, while rectification cannot reopen evidence or negate confiscation-related pe...
Agricultural-land reinvestment qualifies when transfer consideration precedes replacement purchase, while unexamined claims may be reassessed on escap...
Bona fide public fixed-deposit explanations prevent concealment penalties where unexplained-credit additions lack independent evidence of undisclosed ...
Non-conformity of a scrutiny notice under section 143(2) with the CBDT-prescribed format is treated as a procedural defect curable under section 292B, rather than one invalidating the notice or consequential assessment. In appellate proceedings, material admitted as additional evidence must be made available to the Assessing Officer for examination under Rule 46A. Deletions based on unexamined material, or made without recorded reasons, require reconsideration through a fresh, reasoned assessment after hearing the assessee. The notice challenge was rejected, while disputed additions were remitted for de novo assessment.
Non-conformity of a scrutiny notice under section 143(2) with the CBDT-prescribed format is treated as a procedural defect curable under section 292B, rather than one invalidating the notice or consequential assessment. In appellate proceedings, material admitted as additional evidence must be made available to the Assessing Officer for examination under Rule 46A. Deletions based on unexamined material, or made without recorded reasons, require reconsideration through a fresh, reasoned assessment after hearing the assessee. The notice challenge was rejected, while disputed additions were remitted for de novo assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
