Functional comparability under TNMM requires transaction-specific FAR analysis before benchmarking business-support services provided to associated en...
Advance pricing agreement methodology can guide benchmarking for non-covered years when functions, assets, risks and activities remain materially unch...
Tax-audit exemption for substantially State-funded educational universities prevents audit-failure penalties where income qualifies for statutory exem...
Functional, asset and risk analysis excludes diversified technology companies from captive software development comparables under cost-plus arrangemen...
Mobile-phone electronic evidence failed to establish customs undervaluation, while duty survived on non-authentic origin certificates without importer...
Automotive radio classification treats integrated infotainment features as supplementary, placing complete and qualifying unassembled units under the ...
Separate corporate personality prevents directors from being personally liable for company deposits without a guarantee or independent legal undertaki...
Provisional release of seized Ketamine Hydrochloride for export was warranted where a fresh export authorisation covered the same goods after the original authorisation had expired following replacement of the shipment batch. The High Court treated the delay in obtaining the fresh authorisation as technical because the goods remained unexported and the licensing authority had accepted the new authorisation as valid. Customs could not deny its effect merely because the licensing authority had not expressly authorised release of the seized goods. Union departments must maintain consistent positions on the same export transaction. The rejection of provisional release was quashed, subject to a Customs deposit, while adjudication and criminal proceedings remained unaffected.
Provisional release of seized Ketamine Hydrochloride for export was warranted where a fresh export authorisation covered the same goods after the original authorisation had expired following replacement of the shipment batch. The High Court treated the delay in obtaining the fresh authorisation as technical because the goods remained unexported and the licensing authority had accepted the new authorisation as valid. Customs could not deny its effect merely because the licensing authority had not expressly authorised release of the seized goods. Union departments must maintain consistent positions on the same export transaction. The rejection of provisional release was quashed, subject to a Customs deposit, while adjudication and criminal proceedings remained unaffected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
