Constitutional personal-liberty safeguards limit PMLA twin bail conditions where completed investigations lead to prolonged incarceration before trial...
Automated airline software subscriptions without human intervention fail technical-services characterisation and do not make available underlying tech...
Business support recruitment and training receipts qualify for presumptive business taxation, not professional taxation under technical consultancy ru...
Treaty exemption for foreign permanent-establishment management fees prevailed, while dividend expense disallowance remained limited to an accepted al...
Centralised assessment transfers: participation after requesting centralisation can bar technical jurisdictional challenges, while assessment disputes...
Binding precedent remains operative despite pending challenge, supporting deletion of interest disallowance when debt is converted into preference sha...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Regular scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) requires the...
Independent assessment discretion: unauthorised superior-officer consultation can invalidate regular scrutiny assessments by displacing the Assessing Officer's own judgment.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Regular scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) requires the Assessing Officer to exercise quasi-judicial discretion independently. Absent statutory authority, consultation with and prior approval from an Additional Commissioner during the assessment process constitutes unauthorised superior-officer participation and negates the Assessing Officer's independent application of mind. Such assessments are void ab initio and liable to be quashed. A superior officer may consult subordinates without displacing the superior officer's discretion, but subordinate consultation with a superior officer displaces the discretion vested exclusively in the Assessing Officer.
Regular scrutiny assessment under section 143(3) requires the Assessing Officer to exercise quasi-judicial discretion independently. Absent statutory authority, consultation with and prior approval from an Additional Commissioner during the assessment process constitutes unauthorised superior-officer participation and negates the Assessing Officer's independent application of mind. Such assessments are void ab initio and liable to be quashed. A superior officer may consult subordinates without displacing the superior officer's discretion, but subordinate consultation with a superior officer displaces the discretion vested exclusively in the Assessing Officer.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
