Permanent establishment tests: independent subsidiary premises and principal-to-principal dealings did not create Indian taxability for offshore suppl...
Valuation Officer estimates govern property-value additions once statutory valuation is invoked, requiring fresh consideration of objections and compa...
Waiver of written show-cause notice may prevent a later procedural challenge after participation in customs adjudication, preserving statutory appella...
Retrospective invalidity of ocean-freight IGST supports refunds despite non-party status and prior credit utilisation, subject to authorised appeal gr...
Additional evidence in departmental appeals may include show-cause-notice material without introducing a new case where it merely corroborates existin...
Reasoned rectification orders require consideration of expenditure disclosed in income-tax returns, preventing revision based on incomplete income com...
Modified returns after business reorganisations cannot trigger fresh scrutiny once the original assessment was complete, invalidating related transfer...
Third-party loose sheets require reliable nexus before supporting unexplained expenditure additions; presumptions do not establish payer identity or o...
Page of 4918
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 98359 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Export quota premium is not equivalent to export-incentive receipts eligible for deduction under section 80HHC. Administrative circulars bind departmental authorities but cannot bind courts, override statutory language, or displace judicial interpretation. Equating premium from the transfer of export quota with receipts covered by the specified export-incentive provisions would create an impermissible legal fiction, particularly because such premium lacks characteristics of those receipts, including foreign-exchange realisation. Tax deductions must be construed strictly by reference to income derived and the statutory classification of eligible receipts; export quota premium therefore falls outside the claimed deduction.
Export quota premium is not equivalent to export-incentive receipts eligible for deduction under section 80HHC. Administrative circulars bind departmental authorities but cannot bind courts, override statutory language, or displace judicial interpretation. Equating premium from the transfer of export quota with receipts covered by the specified export-incentive provisions would create an impermissible legal fiction, particularly because such premium lacks characteristics of those receipts, including foreign-exchange realisation. Tax deductions must be construed strictly by reference to income derived and the statutory classification of eligible receipts; export quota premium therefore falls outside the claimed deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
