Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Page of 4915
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 98291 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty for alleged cash receipt cannot be imposed without demonstrative evidence establishing the actual cash transaction required for the cash-receipt restriction. Material showed a cash receipt only to a limited extent, while the balance was inferred conjecturally. Because the Revenue did not establish the factual basis for invoking section 269SS, deletion of the section 271D penalty was confirmed and its appeal dismissed.
Penalty for alleged cash receipt cannot be imposed without demonstrative evidence establishing the actual cash transaction required for the cash-receipt restriction. Material showed a cash receipt only to a limited extent, while the balance was inferred conjecturally. Because the Revenue did not establish the factual basis for invoking section 269SS, deletion of the section 271D penalty was confirmed and its appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
