Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Business-expenditure deductibility after transfer of a branch undertaking depends on whether retained statutory assets and related expenditure continued to serve the business. The phrase "for the purpose of business" extends to acts incidental to carrying on business, but substantial legal and professional expenses cannot be allowed without complete particulars on their nature, purpose, and connection with business operations. Where those facts have not been examined, the disallowance requires fresh factual verification. The expenditure claim was remitted for de novo assessment, with the disallowance set aside for reconsideration in accordance with law.
Business-expenditure deductibility after transfer of a branch undertaking depends on whether retained statutory assets and related expenditure continued to serve the business. The phrase "for the purpose of business" extends to acts incidental to carrying on business, but substantial legal and professional expenses cannot be allowed without complete particulars on their nature, purpose, and connection with business operations. Where those facts have not been examined, the disallowance requires fresh factual verification. The expenditure claim was remitted for de novo assessment, with the disallowance set aside for reconsideration in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.