Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Liquidation-process amendments apply prospectively unless expressly made retrospective. A liquidation order fixing the liquidation commencement date and directing the liquidator to explore sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern initiates the governing process; later auction and sale steps merely implement it. A subsequent amendment therefore cannot alter rights and obligations under the regime applicable on that date. The Tribunal set aside retrospective application of the amendment and remanded consequential reliefs and concessions for fresh consideration according to law.
Liquidation-process amendments apply prospectively unless expressly made retrospective. A liquidation order fixing the liquidation commencement date and directing the liquidator to explore sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern initiates the governing process; later auction and sale steps merely implement it. A subsequent amendment therefore cannot alter rights and obligations under the regime applicable on that date. The Tribunal set aside retrospective application of the amendment and remanded consequential reliefs and concessions for fresh consideration according to law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.