Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ To Call / Whatsapp, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query ✕
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search ❮
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 121188
Like 0 Bookmark

Capital Gain Sec 45(5A) & GST RCM on TDR when Developer Alienates Share & Absconds

Date 02 Nov 2026
Replies 0 Replies
Views 23 Views
Capital gains and reverse-charge GST are disputed after a developer allegedly sells the landowner's flats and absconds.
Capital gains taxation under section 45(5A) is questioned where a landowner entered into a registered, area-sharing joint development agreement and the developer allegedly sold the landowner's allocated flats using a forged power of attorney, defaulted on construction and absconded before a completion certificate was issued. The issues include whether capital gains can be taxed in those circumstances and whether the loss of property rights is a capital loss eligible for set-off or carry-forward under sections 70 and 74, or a non-deductible personal loss. The questions, raised with reference to Notification No. 06/2019-CT(R), include whether development rights are a taxable service or a benefit arising from land covered by Schedule III, entry 5, and whether the landowner can be required to pay the reverse-charge liability when the developer absconds without delivering the units. (AI Summary)

Respected Experts,

I seek legal clarity on a complex tax scenario involving a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) compromised by developer fraud.

Facts of the Case:

  1. A Landowner entered into a registered JDA with a Developer in FY 2021-22 under an area-sharing ratio.

  2. Prior to Completion Certificate (CC) issuance, the Developer fraudulently sold the Landowner's allocated flats to third parties via forged POA, defaulted on construction, and absconded.

  3. Income Tax Dept. is invoking Section 45(5A) to demand Capital Gains tax based on the Stamp Duty Value (SDV) of the allocated share.

  4. GST Dept. issued a notice claiming GST under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) on Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) under Sec 9(3)/9(4) of the CGST Act.

Questions for Discussion:

  1. Income Tax (Sec 45(5A)):

    • Can Capital Gains tax be legally levied under Sec 45(5A) when the consideration (allocated flats) never materialized due to third-party fraud and illegal alienation prior to CC?

    • Does the loss of allocated property rights due to fraud qualify as a deductible Capital Loss under Sec 70/74, or is it treated as a non-deductible personal loss?

  2. GST (Notif No. 06/2019-CT(R)):

    • Is TDR a taxable supply of service, or does it fall under Entry 5, Schedule III (Transfer of Immovable Property / benefit arising from land)?

    • Can RCM liability for TDR be recovered from the Landowner when the Developer absconds without delivering the constructed units?

Looking forward to your valuable insights and relevant case laws.

Thanks & Regards,

Aashok Kumar Sharma

0 answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide

No Replies are present.

Recent Issues