Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Appellant fails to meet burden u/s 123 in gold smuggling case; questions arise over legal strategy and appeal choices.
    Appeal Filed Late but Within Condonable 90-Day Limit; Matter Restored Under Commissioner (Appeals) Authority.
    Valuation of Imported Laptops Challenged; Declared Value Rejected Due to NIDB Data; Case Sent Back for Review.
    Customs Broker License Revoked, Penalty Imposed for Fraudulent Activities and Ignoring Document Discrepancies in Customs Operations.
    Tribunal Confirms Penalty Under Customs Act Section 112(a) for Favoritism to IEC Holder; Evidence Reassessment Validates Decision.
    Customs Clearance: Appellant Demonstrated Due Diligence but Proceedings Flawed Due to Noncompliance with Time Limits.
    Revenue Authorities Fail to Prove Gold is Smuggled; Decision Based on Unacceptable Assumptions and Presumptions.
    Court Overturns Confiscation of Gold and Car; Appellant Proves Lawful Ownership and Source, Penalty Set Aside.
    High Court overturns order due to lack of written notice under Customs Act Sec. 124(a); violation of natural justice.
    Tribunal Confirms Duty-Free Import Eligibility Under Project Import Regulations, 1986; Revenue's Appeal Dismissed.
    Petitioner's Related Party Transaction Prices Under Scrutiny; Report Quashed Due to Procedural Flaw; Case Remanded for Review.
    High Court Quashes Order: DRI's Additional Director General Not a "Proper Officer" per Supreme Court, Lacks Jurisdiction.
    Court Rules Denial of Reasons for DEL Listing Violates Natural Justice u/r 7 of Foreign Trade Rules.
    Deputy Commissioner of Customs at ICD Whitefield to review and decide on IGST refund claim within eight weeks.
    High Court Upholds DGFT Notification Validity u/s 3(2) of Foreign Trade Act, Binding on Petitioners.
    Matter Referred to Larger Bench for Review After Single Member Bench Disagrees with Division Benches' Opinions.
    High Court Orders Release of Seized Goods After Customs Misses Deadline u/s 110(2) of the Customs Act.
    Court Decision on SAD Refunds Pre-GST Period Misguided by Rescinded Notification No. 34/1998-Cus.
    Customs Refund Claims: Unjust Enrichment Doctrine Inapplicable to Public Sector; Proof of Duty Incidence Required.
    Procedural Lapse in MEIS Scheme: Incorrect Shipping Bill Marking Leads to Unjust NOC Rejection.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax