Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Court Rules Against Suo Motu Revisional Power in Sales Tax Case Due to Distinct Facts in Cited Decision.
    Petitioners' ITC Liability Questioned: Need to Verify Goods Receipt by Examining Supplier in Alleged Fake Invoice Case.
    Penalty Under KVAT Act Section 53(12)(a)(i) Requires Discretionary Review; Case Remitted for Reevaluation and Reasoned Decision.
    Penalty u/s 43(2) of Orissa VAT Act 2004 Requires AO's Discretion; Not Automatic for Tax Issues.
    Assessing Authority Finds Discrepancies in Refund Claim; Petitioner's Counsel Fails to Prove Illegalities or Violations of the Act.
    Compounding Notice Deemed Non-Speaking Due to Lack of Explanation, Violating Natural Justice Principles; Procedural Deficiencies Noted.
    Reassessment Under VAT Act Section 34 (8A) Challenged Due to Lack of Pending Proceedings After Seven Years.
    Dealers can claim additional input tax credit without time limits; Section 35 doesn't restrict late filings for statutory benefits.
    Court Rules Denying ITC Benefit Contradicts Legislative Intent of Entry 65/Schedule A, TNVAT Act.
    Penalties Under KVAT Act Sec 72(2) Aren't Automatic; Specific Conditions Under Sec 64 Must Be Met First.
    High Court Rules Amendment to Section 40 Has Retrospective Effect, Overturns Karnataka Appellate Tribunal's Time-Barred Decision.
    Court Rules Form VAT 240 Invalid for Input Tax Credit Claim; Proper Return Filing Required Under KVAT Act Sections 10(3) & 10(4).
    Appeals u/s 72: Use Appellate Authority for VAT Refund Disputes Before Approaching High Court's Writ Jurisdiction.
    Chandrika Soap must be mostly handmade with significant artistic appeal to qualify as handmade in ongoing and future cases.
    Excise Duty Levied on Goods Removal, Not Sale; 5% Transit Loss Claimed, 1% Deemed Reasonable by Authorities.
    Court Scrutinizes VAT Classification of Glow Mint & Glow Fair Moisturisers; Supplier Fails to Provide Samples for Analysis.
    Court Denies Immunity to VAT Officer; Accepting Bribe Not Protected Under Judges (Protection) Act, Section 3.
    Petitioner's Claims Dismissed for Not Meeting Pre-Deposit Requirement u/s 62(5) of Punjab VAT Act.
    Court Rules Tax Refund Justified for Company on Excess Tax Paid for Diesel in Inter-State Trade for Mining Activities.
    Petitioner in IT services failed to seek proper tax guidance under Tamil Nadu VAT Act 2006, risking compliance issues.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax