Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Disciplinary proportionality requires penalties for Authorised Representative misconduct to match proven harm, leading to reconsideration of registrat...
Failure to consider a taxpayer's reply to the pre-show cause intimation and supporting documents vitiated the subsequent DRC-01 show cause notice. The HC noted the admitted position that the objections filed against the DRC-01A notice were not examined before issuance of the notice denying input tax credit. In light of the State's statement that the materials would be considered afresh, the Court quashed the impugned notice and directed the competent authority to reconsider the objections and documents and pass a fresh speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law within the stipulated time.
Failure to consider a taxpayer's reply to the pre-show cause intimation and supporting documents vitiated the subsequent DRC-01 show cause notice. The HC noted the admitted position that the objections filed against the DRC-01A notice were not examined before issuance of the notice denying input tax credit. In light of the State's statement that the materials would be considered afresh, the Court quashed the impugned notice and directed the competent authority to reconsider the objections and documents and pass a fresh speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law within the stipulated time.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
