Transfer pricing comparability requires turnover and functional analysis, alongside rules on exempt-income disallowance and amalgamation goodwill depr...
Complainant participation in insolvency disciplinary appeals is not automatically mandatory, while later representative changes do not undo valid acts...
Direct appeals against provisional attachment under money laundering law fall outside appellate jurisdiction, which covers adjudicating authority orde...
Cross-border secondment reimbursements require separate employment and knowledge-transfer analysis before taxation as included services under the Indi...
A waiver application under Notification No. 21/2024-Central Tax was treated by the High Court as subject to a directory, not mandatory, three-month filing period because the notification used the word may. The rejection of the application solely on the ground of delay was therefore based on an erroneous interpretation of law. The Court quashed the rejection in FORM GST SPL-07 and directed the authority to reconsider the waiver application on merits in accordance with law, while keeping the show cause notice, summary notice and order in original in abeyance until that reconsideration.
A waiver application under Notification No. 21/2024-Central Tax was treated by the High Court as subject to a directory, not mandatory, three-month filing period because the notification used the word may. The rejection of the application solely on the ground of delay was therefore based on an erroneous interpretation of law. The Court quashed the rejection in FORM GST SPL-07 and directed the authority to reconsider the waiver application on merits in accordance with law, while keeping the show cause notice, summary notice and order in original in abeyance until that reconsideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4949 
Get Daily Updates 
